|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Fire, Page Sixteen
It must dawn on one who studies the works of Schwaller de Lubicz that the immensity of the marvels of ancient Egypt have not yet been fathomed in our time, nor shall they be so long as our quest remains only in the realm of matter.75 The importance of this realization cannot be overemphasized when we contemplate Steiner's revelation that we must both retraverse (i.e., reassimilate) and transform all that we came through on our descent. With that we come to the significance of certain terms and concepts as they relate to the Bible, namely, the phoenix, the palm and the one hundred forty-four thousand. Steiner spoke often of the Egyptian myth of Osiris (Osiris, Isis, Horus and Typhon), and to a lesser extent of the significance of the Sphinx.76 Though I've read only a fraction of his works, I have no recollection of his mentioning the phoenix myth, but certainly the truths it reflects are manifoldly expressed there. However the phoenix myth is widely attested, and we will examine it.77Starting with modern Bible literature, we read in 5 ABD 363, "Phoenix (Bird and Poem)":
The account then traces the Egyptian version back as early as 2500 B.C. "to the Heliopolitan mythology of Atum/Re … [a] creation account [which] portrays the emergence of land and life from the primeval waters," at least back to the time of "the origin of the inhabited world." It is hard to escape the comparison of this beginning with that of the beginning of reincarnation in humanity's evolution in Lemuria, as related in the Gen 3 creation myth of Moses, himself an Egyptian initiate (see I-2). It is hard not to notice the similarity in sound between "Atum" and "Adam," or even between "Atum" and "Aum" (see the discussion of "Aum/I Am" at pp. 268-270 in The Burning Bush). The first paragraph under "phoenix" in 9 Brit 393 reads:
There is something very significant in this particular descriptionthe "nest of aromatic boughs and spices" that is "set on fire, and … consumed in the flames" from whose "pyre miraculously sprang a new phoenix, which after embalming its father's ashes in an egg of myrrh, flew to … Egypt." Or, in the other version, it immolates itself in an "altar fire, from which the young phoenix" arises. We will see below the significance of the palm tree. Surely we must see that Matthew's Gospel incorporates this myth in regard to the Zarathustra Individuality reborn as the Solomon Jesus child (see "The Nativity" in The Burning Bush). The spiritual students of Zarathustrianism, the magi (wise men) of Mt 2,1 bring the infant child gifts of gold, frankincense and myrrh (Mt 2,11). Gold has always been recognized as the metal of the Sun.78 Myrrh is "a fragrant, bitter-tasting gum resin exuded from … plants of Arabia and East Africa, used in making incense, perfume, etc." (WNWCD). Frankincense is a combination of two root words, "frank" and "incense," the first being an archaic term meaning "free in giving; generous," and the second, deriving from a root meaning "to burn." It is a gum or resin substance producing a pleasant odor when burned (WNWCD; see also 4 ABD 940, "myrrh," and 2 ABD, "frankincense"). Not only are these three symbols of the phoenix myth grouped together as gifts from the Zarathustrian magi, but immediately after their appearance the parents of the Solomon Jesus child are told to take him into Egypt (Mt 2,13-15). It is this Individuality, the Zarathustrian Ego, that emerges in Luke's Gospel in the twelve-year-old Jesus of Nazareth who is the "suffering servant" of Second Isaiah, surrendering itself for the entry of the Christ Spirit at the Baptism.79 Then at the end of his Gospel, as do all the Evangelists, Matthew gives the equivalent of the ancient bird's self-immolation in the "altar fire from which the new phoenix rises." WNWCD says that the phoenix is "a beautiful, lone bird which lives in the Arabian desert for 500 or 600 years and then sets itself on fire, rising renewed from the ashes to start another long life: a symbol of immortality." RHCD calls it, "a unique mythological bird of great beauty fabled to live 500 or 600 years, to burn itself to death, and to rise from its ashes in the freshness of youth, and live through another life cycle." The Encyclopedia Britannica tells us, "A mosaic at Antioch represents the Phoenixthe solar bird who died and resurrected from its own ashes and who was its own father and son at the same timewith sunrays encircling its head" (24 Brit 713, "Mystery Religions; Religious Art and Iconography; Mosaics"). The time cycle of the phoenix is of interest. It coincides very closely with the average cycle of reincarnation, according to Steiner.80 And just as the majority of that time period is spent on an Individuality's journey between death and rebirth (see I-33), we note that the life of the phoenix also illustrates the path of the soul (the Ego, "I Am," or Individuality) between lives rather than during an earthly life. Aside from the relatively short time of its purification in the astral world, the soul's sojourn in spiritland (devachan) in the company of the heavenly host must be described as incredibly beautiful (like the bird) in comparison with life on Earth. The fashioning of a nest as its pyre (fire) portrays what the Ego does as it approaches physical birth, selecting appropriate parents and circumstances in accord with its destiny, then entering the birth canal through the narrow isthmus where the etheric fire meets the earthly fire in a newly born human body. But the fire itself must rage during the entirety of the earthly life and perhaps even through the "purifying fire" of the ensuing astral world before birth into spiritland is again accomplished. Time itself is not a major factor for the fire, for the life of the bird is measured by the period in spiritland. This reversal of the normal way of looking at the myth also takes into account the nature of the bird as an allegorical symbol relating to the more spiritual nature, whereas the ashes more properly reflect the flesh of earthly life. That the bird is both its own father and son (parent and child) tells us that the earthly life fashions the soul's life in spiritland, while the latter in turn fashions the next earthly life, all as a part of the karmic cycle leading to "perfection," the gold as a symbol of the Sun (or Heliopolis, the City of the Sun; cf. Rev. 21,15,18,21,23). Anthroposophy does not adopt the Oriental cyclical view of ever repeating lives, but rather the Western linear view of progress toward such perfection (Mt 5,48), but in this it lays the basis for reconciliation between the religions of East and West, for Christianity had Eastern parents and was born on the border between the two. Notably, even in later times (ca. A.D. 1600), a constellation (Phoenix) visible in the southern hemisphere was named for the mythical bird; see 28 Brit 225, "Stars and Star Clusters." Early Christendom also accepted the myth as a symbol of human resurrection. Surely Paul must have been among those from whom it came. The author of The First Epistle of Clement is probably the one Paul calls his "fellow worker" in Phil 4,3.81 Chapter XXV of the letter reads: The Phoenix: An Emblem of Our Resurrection
There is an editorial footnote at the end which reads, "This fable respecting the phoenix is mentioned by Herodotus (ii,73) and by Pliny (Nat. Hist., x,2), and is used as above by Tertullian (145-220 A.D.) (De Resurr., sec. 13) and by others of the Fathers." Tertullian's "On the Resurrection of the Flesh," Chap. XIII (3 NICENE-1, p. 554), reads as follows: FROM
OUR AUTHOR'S VIEW OF A VERSE IN THE
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||